The Supreme Court rejected the appeal Garzon New York courses
Posted on February 26, 2010 by cesa
The judge had asked for the annulment proceedings by powerlessness .- The case now goes to the instructor will call to testify at the hearing judge.
The Supreme Court has rejected an appeal from Judge Baltasar Garzon on alleged payments he received between 2005 and 2006 by the organization of some courses in New York when he was on study leave. The case now goes to the instructor, Manuel Marchena, who summon the magistrate had asked quuien invalid action after lawyers Panea Antonio and José Luis Mazon back to complain after having been filed the case at first, in March 2009.
Garzon had pleaded helplessness, but the court rejected this argument. “There are no relevant helplessness, as the steps taken only affect a decision of admissibility in any condition of the resolution on the merits,” the car.
The judge of the Audiencia Nacional had called for the nullification of actions taken by the Supreme Court, as the data request to Santander and the University of New York, where the seminars were held on the grounds that there had been “a material statement of the case “without being allowed to defend themselves.
Despite having been filed the case, the Criminal Division to accept back a month ago to act on the complaint filed by Pane and Mazon in which the judge is accused of having committed crimes of bribery and prevariación.
According to the Supreme, his requests for information about these courses at both the University and the Banco Santander “was to collect the background information on the activity of the respondent, and was directed exclusively to check the consistency of the evidence underlying the likelihood of new facts alleged by the complainants, according to which the respondent (Garzon), had requested personally finance their activities. “